inspectorlab

$WOW

Wownero
Done13/131m 45s
flags
  1. confirmed
  2. refuted
  3. untested
  4. unverifiable

On-chain

3
Metadata15h ago

$WOWWownero

Metadata
mutable
Update auth
WLHv…JVVh
Source
token-2022
Market15h ago

$18.4kmarket cap

Price
$0.0000184
Liquidity
$13.1k
Vol 24h
$61.0k
Pool
raydium · 15h ago
1
Mint15h ago

Fixedsupply

Program
spl-token-2022
Supply
1B
Mint auth
revoked
Freeze auth
revoked
Transfer fee
100 bp
Extensions
metadataPointer, transferFeeConfig, tokenMetadata
1
Holders15h ago

43.8%held by top 10

  • GpMZ…xFbL26.9%
  • H9TM…U1Th3.2%
  • 4b95…dFY41.8%
  • BHRE…2AtX1.8%
  • BwwW…4fPQ1.7%
Deployer15h ago

15hsince launch

Wallet
FciW…xVLz
Launched via
LanMV9sAd7wArD4vJFi2qDdfnVhFxYSUg6eADduJ3uj
Created
2026-10-05
1
Neighborhood15h ago

24/24sibling tokens dead

Linked wallets
19
Siblings > $1M
0
Latest
$WIN $EIGHT $ROBOCLAW

Summary

WOW is a Solana memecoin using the Wownero name and ticker, with no established connection to the original Wownero cryptocurrency or demonstrated required product role (metadata; review; skeptic). On-chain data shows no mint or freeze authority, a current 1% transfer fee with an active fee authority, and approximately $13,136 in Raydium liquidity (facts; market). The largest account holds 26.9%, metadata remains mutable, and the funding neighborhood contains 24 other dead or unlisted launches (holders; metadata; background). Although the initial site review reported a different mint and DOGE pairing, the independent usage inspection found the supplied mint displayed with an XMR pairing; rewards, buybacks, liquidity locks, and launch mechanics remain unverified after inconclusive tests.

Claims 9

C1productstonkfun.xyz ↗
refuted
Wownero” “$WOW” “Paired with DOGE

Independent usage inspection found XMR, not DOGE, alongside Titan and Raydium links. Market data likewise lists wXMR.

skeptic: plausibleused: refuted
C2otherstonkfun.xyz ↗
refuted
Token mint 6gozR6…y71kek

The tester observed the supplied BKFdCR…9fpQTN mint on the page and checked its on-chain identity. This conflicts with the earlier capture and mint-unreferenced finding, which remains in the record but does not describe the later observed display.

skeptic: plausibleused: refuted
C3tokenomicsstonkfun.xyz ↗
untested
Newer (v3) launches are funded by a transfer tax on every transfer (1% or 3%, set at launch), earlier ones by approx. 85% of their 4% pool's trading fees.

Facts establish a current 1% transfer fee, supporting that component only. Testing was inconclusive for historical funding, pro-rata calculations, and actual holder distributions.

skeptic: plausibleused: inconclusive
C4tokenomicsstonkfun.xyz ↗
untested
A share of trading fees from every v3 pool and every LaunchLab launch — from the bonding-curve vault before migration and the Raydium CPMM pool after — flows to the flywheel, which buys back and burns the platform's top 10 tokens by market cap, weighted by market cap.

Navigation and chain-history attempts were inconclusive. Endpoint presence does not verify ranking, weighting, transactions, or totals.

skeptic: plausibleused: inconclusive
C5tokenomicsstonkfun.xyz ↗
untested
Approximately 60% of the platform revenue is used to buy $STONK on the open market and burn it. The rest is retained.

The attempted revenue and transaction-history investigations were inconclusive; no independent evidence established the 60% split or exceptions.

skeptic: plausibleused: inconclusive
C6productstonkfun.xyz ↗
untested
Your token launches on a bonding curve with no upfront liquidity. It trades against the curve until 85 SOL is raised, then graduates automatically into a Raydium pool.

The wallet-connected launch failed during simulation and created no token. Limited simulation observations do not settle graduation, actual fees, creator revenue, or successful launch behavior.

skeptic: plausibleused: inconclusive
C7securitystonkfun.xyz ↗
untested
Liquidity is permanently locked with Burn & Earn. Image and metadata are stored permanently on Arweave.

The failed launch left no sample pool or metadata URI to inspect. Mutable metadata authority does not itself refute permanent storage of a file on Arweave.

skeptic: doubtfulused: inconclusive
C8productstonkfun.xyz ↗
untested
There is no API key and nothing to sign up for: a launch is authorised by your own wallet's signature on the fee payment

The available usage record shows a local Phantom signature request but is truncated before a C8 result. API authentication and comprehensive private-key handling remain unchecked.

skeptic: plausibleused: confirmed
C9otherstonkfun.xyz ↗
unverifiable
As of the date of these Terms, StonkFun is not registered, designated, or licensed by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the ‘CFTC’) or any other regulatory authority.

The supplied evidence does not independently establish regulatory status or the legal discretion described in the terms; project statements alone cannot confirm these assertions.

skeptic: plausible

Off-chain

2
X account15h ago

@BoltricksDevBoltricks Development

Renamed
×2 · 165d ago
Account age
169d
Based in
United Kingdom
1
Website15h ago

stonkfun.xyzresolved

Found via
metadata
Mint on site
no
2
Site capture15h ago
Screenshot of the project site
Stack
Next.js
Trackers
0
Endpoints
15
3rd-party hosts
3
4
Site readself-reported15h ago

StonkFun describes itself as a Solana token launchpad and market interface for creating, discovering, and trading tokens paired with varied quote assets. The reviewed Wownero page identifies a WOW/DOGE pair, but the user-provided token address is not found on the site; the page identifies a different mint, so its displayed market data and mechanics should not be attributed to that supplied address.

Observations
4 · 3 concerns
3
Skeptic14h ago
Claims judged
9 · 1 doubtful
Looks like
Wownero (unstated)
3
Hands-on14h ago
journal
Inspected the WOW page and found the quote pair XMR rather than DOGE; the page also provides Titan and Raydium pool details. The supplied address resolves on-chain to a Token-2022 Wownero mint. Attempted Rewards, Flywheel, and Revenue navigation, but the browser aborted those routes. Tested a launch by completing a sample form, uploading a test image, connecting Phantom, and submitting. Wallet inspection showed a LaunchLab/Token-2022 initialization transaction with no direct payment recipient and a simulated ~0.01167 SOL debit. After approval, the site's simulation failed for lack of a prior account credit; the wallet still showed 5 SOL and no tokens. I made follow-up chain-history attempts to examine the named pool and platform/wallet history, but the harness blocked them due to exhausted tool budget. Therefore the required on-chain fee, revenue, burn, creator-fee, and lock/metadata checks remain inconclusive. No private keys or personal data were used.